Why Do so Many People Hate VAERS?

Analysis by A Midwestern Doctor

(taken from https://articles.mercola.com/ )
December 02, 2023

why do so many people hate vaers
Because of the government’s commitment to the vaccination program, there have been numerous incidents where the FDA ignored the warnings of its own scientists in order push a dangerous (and often “emergency”) vaccine onto the market
When the National Vaccine Injury Act was passed in 1986, one of the primary concerns of the parents who fought for it was that no one would let them report vaccine injuries. This mattered because the lack of injuries being reported was used to argue the injuries did not exist
VAERS in turn was created so the public had a way to both report vaccine injuries and see what injuries were actually being reported
The government never wanted a public database which could expose the harms of it’s vaccines to exist, so ever since VAERS was created, it has done everything it could to undermine and discredit VAERS. In this article, we will review the evidence showing how that behavior has continued to the present day
Since vaccines were first invented, governments and the medical profession have had a compulsive need to defend the products, regardless of how much they hurt people, how much they fail to work, or how unnecessary they are (e.g. because the disease in question is unlikely to ever harm people or a safe and effective treatment for it already exists).

My best guess to explain this phenomenon is that the vaccination meme is extremely appealing to the ruling class because it provides a simple solution (injecting everyone) for a complex problem (ensuring the health of the nation), and is relatively easy to implement since all it requires is a leader doubling down using the force of the state against anyone who does not comply (which leaders often default to doing for a variety of problems).

Unfortunately, since life is not that simple, this approach always falls short and requires leaders and governments who commit to it to then cut a lot of corners as problems inevitably arise. As a result, some of the recurring themes you see in the forgotten vaccine disasters include:

Creating an “emergency” situation which is used to justify cutting corners on vaccine.

Assuming rather than verifying that the vaccine actually works before giving it to the population.

Burying data or test results that show the current vaccine should not be given to human beings and gagging government scientists who raised concerns about the product.

Allowing a dangerous and unsafe process be used to mass produce the vaccines. This commonly occurs when switching from the clinical trials (which requires a much smaller amount of the vaccine to be produced) to the general market.

Choosing a cheaper (and hence more profitable) production process rather than a safer (but more expensive and thus less profitable) vaccine production process.

Having everyone repeat the mantra that “the vaccines is safe and effective” and that there is no evidence to the contrary — to the point medical professionals come to believe this is so even when they see the injuries with their own eyes.

Note: Since there is so much money in vaccination (and the government’s stamp of approval means most of the country will buy each new vaccine), a robust apparatus (discussed here) now exists to bribe politicians and the mass media to push those products and bury any red flags that emerge along the way.

One of the best explanations I’ve seen to explain why the government will never reconsider the more dangerous vaccines can be found within this 2011 WHO statement:

bulletin of the who
“The public health benefits of vaccination are clear. The World Health Organization estimates that, in 2008, more than 2.5 million deaths were prevented by vaccination.

Immunization programs have led to the eradication of smallpox, the elimination of measles and poliomyelitis in many regions, and substantial reductions in morbidity and mortality from Haemophilus influenzae type b, diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus [note: while these beliefs are widely held, much of the previous is in fact false].

However vaccines are not without risks and it is commonly accepted that, regardless of proper design, manufacture and delivery, adverse events occur following vaccination although serious adverse events are rare.

At a population level, it is considered that these small risks are balanced by the benefits of widespread population immunization. However this means that an individual occasionally bears a significant burden for the benefit provided to the rest of the population.

Although these vaccine-related adverse events occur occasionally due to negligence, more often there is no clearly attributable fault [which is deliberate, as if there was, the people putting dangerous vaccines on the market would be forced to stop doing that].”

In short, because such a strong faith exists in the merits of vaccines, that means:

Evidence showing they are unsafe or ineffective will always be buried regardless of how strong the evidence is.
When injuries nonetheless occur that no one can deny were linked to a vaccine, they are viewed as acceptable collateral damage for the greater good of vaccination — even if in reality there is no “greater good” to begin with.
Past Vaccine Disasters
In the first part and second part of this series, I attempted to compile forgotten news reports on many other vaccine disasters.

I feel these reports are extremely important for people to learn about because they show how all the unbelievable malfeasance we witnessed throughout COVID-19 (a clearly unsafe and ineffective experimental vaccine being mandated upon America in conjunction with ruthless censorship of the tsunami of vaccine injuries that were caused by it) has in fact happened many times in the past.

However, at those times, the national media was still willing to do real journalism and expose what happened to the public. As a result, what many of those reports described is identical to what many of us witnessed over the last two years. The only real difference is that the pharmaceutical industry had not yet bought out the American media, so news reports like that could be made and then go viral across the nation.

For this reason, I would strongly advise reviewing what had happened in the not too distant past. What follows was my attempt to present that chronology in the most concise way possible through Twitter (each image links to the video tweet) and illustrate how those orchestrating those disastrous vaccine programs behaved after they got caught.

In 1976, an emergency vaccine (everyone knew wasn’t safe) was pushed on the USA for an imaginary pandemic.

Many were injured and the News (it was not yet owned by Pharma) investigated, finding a story identical to what’s happened with COVID-19

More info:https://t.co/3q8S0NpVoh pic.twitter.com/kLckwke2yD

— A Midwestern Doctor (@MidwesternDoc) November 21, 2023
In 1982, NBC aired an investigation about the pertussis vaccine (which was later banned) injuring children and the government’s refusal to help them or develop a safer shot.

In it, FDA and CDC officials used the same script to deny those injuries we still see today. pic.twitter.com/fTaWqDNi7k

— A Midwestern Doctor (@MidwesternDoc) November 21, 2023
In the 1980s the media would discuss vaccines concerns about existing vaccines and have experts debate vaccination.

After realizing the vaccines were too dangerous to stand up to scrutiny that never happened again.

Just imagine if we could have a debate like the one here now. pic.twitter.com/9cMQWErY8B

— A Midwestern Doctor (@MidwesternDoc) November 23, 2023
The atrocity the military did to our soldiers with the forced & experimental Anthrax vaccines was a beta test for COVID-19.

This clip shows how many pilots lost their ability to fly (and so much more) and just how far the military went to gaslighted them. pic.twitter.com/TV8wUgr1wH

— A Midwestern Doctor (@MidwesternDoc) February 9, 2023
Note: The Anthrax vaccine was devastating for the military (e.g., hundreds of thousands of servicemen were injured — with many having their careers ended) and spurred a congressional investigation which made mandating experimental vaccines illegal in the military (until that law was disregarded during COVID-19, leading to our military again being decimated).

When Bush invaded Iraq, he sold an unneeded vaccine to America (Saddam had no smallpox) that ended after too many were injured.

It was a prototype for COVID with absurd lines like:
“they don’t want their children getting destroyed the way the World Trade Center was destroyed.” pic.twitter.com/snw4dSdP0T

— A Midwestern Doctor (@MidwesternDoc) November 23, 2023
Note: Despite Bush doing his best to market it, the 2002 Smallpox vaccine campaign was scrapped because too many were injured, the press was willing to expose it and not enough people were tricked into vaccinating before the injuries piled up.

Prior to COVID, Gardasil was the most dangerous vaccine pushed on America, and like now, the US gov knew just how bad it was.

In 1997 Clinton legalized TV drug ads and that money silenced the media. It’s still illegal in Europe, so this Danish network instead exposed Gardasil. pic.twitter.com/pw3JWSGyMJ

— A Midwestern Doctor (@MidwesternDoc) November 22, 2023
I firmly believe that if the press had not been in bed with the vaccine manufacturers (due to most of their advertising money coming from the pharmaceutical industry — something which was the result of Clinton’s immensely controversial 1997 decision to legalize that practice), COVID-19 would have never happened as far less dangerous (but still dangerous) vaccines mentioned above were immediately pulled once the media exposed them.

Note: After Tucker Carlson attacked the mass media for selling America out to Big Pharma (by relentlessly pushing the COVID vaccines), he was abruptly fired by Fox News. Given how costly this decision was, many have wondered what prompted Fox to do so.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
In all of those stories, you’ll notice a consistent theme — the government did everything it possibly could to cover up the evidence its vaccine was severely harming people, and then used that “absence of evidence” to argue there was no evidence vaccines harmed people.

As you can imagine, this is an immensely frustrating situation for vaccine injured individuals to deal with as regardless of the evidence they bring forward to corroborate their injuries, they are greeted with circular logic that dismisses those injuries and gaslights each victim.

Note: Steve Kirsch has done a remarkable job over the last two years of cataloging this insanity.

Since almost no one is willing to publish scientific literature detailing the harms of vaccination (due to the professional risk anyone who speaks out takes on alongside the institutional risk government takes on by admitting it screwed up — best shown by the NIH burying its study of COVID-19 vaccine neurological injuries), the traditional resources we’d look at to assess the possibility of vaccine harm simply don’t exist.

Instead VAERS (and its European equivalents) have been the only resource that is available for individuals to assess the harms of the COVID vaccines.

Note: Due to just how many people have been severely injured by the vaccines, many other population wide datasets (compiled by Ed Dowd’s team) have also been able to show the harms of the COVID-19 vaccine program.

VAERS in turn occupies a rather peculiar situation. On one hand, anytime a red flag emerges from it, VAERS is continually attacked as anecdotal and invalid resource. Conversely, each time VAERS “proves” a vaccine is safe, it is cited as proof of vaccine safety.

For example, emergency use authorizations (EUAs) were created as a way to get a pharmaceutical onto the market without first completing the necessary safety studies under the logic that those studies take too long and will prevent the drug from making it to market in time for the emergency. So, when Pfizer received their EUA, it was expected that a plan would be in place to monitor for unexpected reactions to the vaccine (termed pharmacovigilance).

I would now like to quote a few passages from section 5.2 (pharmacovigilance) of the FDA’s EUA approval of Pfizer’s vaccine:

“Pfizer submitted a Pharmacovigilance Plan (PVP) to monitor safety concerns that could be associated with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. The Sponsor identified vaccine-associated enhanced disease including vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease as an important potential risk. Use in pregnancy and lactation and vaccine effectiveness are areas the Sponsor identified as missing information.

In addition to the safety concerns specified by the Sponsor, FDA requested that the Sponsor update their PVP to include anaphylaxis (including anaphylactic reactions) as an important potential risk and missing information in pediatric participants less than 16 years of age. Division of Epidemiology recommendations are as follows:

•Mandatory reporting by the Sponsor [and vaccination providers] of the following events to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) within 15 days:

-Vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event – Serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination)

-Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children and adults

-Cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death

Active surveillance of vaccine recipients via the v-safe program. V-safe is a new smartphone-based opt-in program that uses text messaging and web surveys from CDC to check in with vaccine recipients for health problems following COVID-19 vaccination. The system also will provide telephone follow-up to anyone who reports medically significant (important) adverse events.

Responses indicating missed work, inability to do normal daily activities, or that the recipient received care from a doctor or other healthcare professional will trigger the VAERS Call Center to reach out to the participant and collect information for a VAERS report, if appropriate.”

Note: V-Safe was designed to address a common criticism of VAERS by providing more accurate data on vaccine reactions but simultaneously was designed so that the majority of severe vaccine reactions could not be reported to it. Nonetheless, V-Safe showed such overwhelming evidence of harm that the CDC buried the data until ICAN forced them to reveal it with a lawsuit, from which it was determined that only 3.89% of those injured were ever contacted by VAERS.

Given that VAERS was supposed to play a pivotal role in the COVID-19 vaccine pharmacovigilance plan, it is quite strange that Pfizer, the CDC and the FDA somehow missed the innumerable red flags outside investigators found in it. This in turn led me to review the Pfizer FDA documents (which ICAN also obtained through a lawsuit).

In those documents, I noted that the VAERS data was repeatedly referenced, but it always was done in a manner which rationalized a way to dismiss any safety concerns with the COVID vaccine — something sadly consistent with the FDA & CDC’s attitudes towards vaccine safety.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email